Legal Opinion
Deepwell Homeowners'protective Assn. v. City Council of City of Palm Springs
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 24, 1965No. Civ. 8201PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■BRAY, J. *
Petitioners, Deepwell Homeowners’ Protective Association, a nonprofit corporation, and several homeowners in Palm Springs, seek a writ of supersedeas to stay enforcement of a judgment of the superior court, entered after order sustaining demurrer to petition without leave to amend, and to restrain, pending final determination of the appeal therefrom, the granting of a conditional use permit approving site plans, permitting the razing of buildings and the construction of apartment units.
Questions Presented
1. Does this court have jurisdiction to issue supersedeas ?
2. Is supersedeas…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Food & Grocery Bureau v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Nuckolls v. Bank of California, National Assn.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Hulse v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Private Investors, Inc. v. Homestake Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Veyna v. Orange County Nursery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Banach v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Masonite Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- F. C. Y. Construction & Equipment Co. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.