Legal Opinion

Cordell v. Codington County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1994No. 18644PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*116WUEST, Justice.

Codington County appeals the circuit court’s denial of a building permit issued by the County to ATY Feeder Pigs, Inc. (ATY) allowing ATY to expand its feeder pig operation in rural Codington County. We affirm the circuit court.

FACTS

ATY Feeder Pigs, Inc. (ATY) is a corporation owned by six farmers for the express purpose of providing a hog production operation for themselves in rural Codington County. ATY has been in operation since 1975 raising pigs from farrowing to 40-lb. feeder pigs at which time the pigs are distributed back to the six individual farmers and the surplus…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Vellinga v. VellingaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Board of Regents v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API