Board of Regents v. Carter
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Justice.
This case involves two issues. The first is whether the South Dakota Board of Regents (Regents) may hire the services of independent counsel in bringing this action. The South Dakota Attorney General (Attorney General), as intervenor in this case, maintains that the Regents may not do so. The second is whether SDCL 3-18 is an unconstitutional infringement upon the Regents’ control of the state’s educational institutions. We hold that the Regents may employ counsel outside the Attorney General’s office in bringing this suit and that SDCL 3-18, this state’s public employee labor…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Synod of Dakota v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Adams v. HerriedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Prchal v. DaileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- South Dakota Automobile Club, Inc. v. VolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SeidschlawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.