Legal Opinion

Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 14269PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOYT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Secretary of Revenue (Secretary) that SDCL 35-4-5.1 and SDCL 35-4-5.5 precluded a renewal of a wholesale liquor license to-Famous Brands, Inc. (appellant). We reverse.

The factual background of the controversy is refreshingly simple. Appellant filed a petition to obtain a declaratory ruling pursuant to SDCL 1-26-15 and ARSD 64:01:01:08 as to the applicability of SDCL 35-4-5.1 and SDCL 35-4-5.5 to the proposed renewal of the appellant’s wholesale liquor license. SoDak Distributing Company…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API