Legal Opinion

Foster v. Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 28, 2003No. 20020817-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

T1 Plaintiffs Shirley Foster and the Myotherapy College of Utah (collectively, Foster) appeal from two trial court orders enforcing a Settlement Agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement) between Foster and defendants Paul Montgomery, et al. (collectively, Montgomery). The trial court's first Order granted Montgomery's cross-motion to enforce the Agreement. A second Order to Enforce was entered eighteen months later, at the request of Mont gomery, due to Foster's failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement. On appeal, Foster claims that the Agreement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Serrato v. Utah Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  5. Sackler v. SavinUtah Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young H2ORE v. J and M TransmissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  2. Panos v. Olsen & Associates Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  3. In Re Estate of PahlCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  4. Code v. Utah Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  5. Dale K. Barker Co., Pc v. John K. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API