Legal Opinion

Pitt Ohio Express v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2006No. 54 WAP 2005PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

On April 3, 1996, claimant Duane Wolff suffered a back injury while working as a truck driver for Pitt Ohio Express. He received total disability compensation benefits until November 4, 1997, when a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granted employer’s petition to suspend benefits, concluding Wolff failed to pursue in good faith a modified position offered to him by employer. When Wolff later underwent back *101surgery, in September, 2000, the parties executed a supplemental agreement to reinstate his total disability benefits as of the surgery date.

In October, 2001, employer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. In the Interest of O.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Spinabelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico IndemnitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Butta v. Geico Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Kretschmann Farm, LLC v. Township of New SewickleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. McNeil v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Department of Corrections, SCI-Graterford)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Napierski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API