Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1994No. 27 W.D. Appeal Docket 1993PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The narrow question in this case arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act is whether the appellant met his burden of proof with respect to his petition seeking to modify an award of compensation for partial disability to one for total disability. To answer this question, however, we must examine the broader issue of what elements make up that burden of proof.

Thomas Dillon suffered a lower back strain while working for Greenwich Collieries on September 13, 1976. Compensation for total disability was paid pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable issued September…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Bufford v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Newcomer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API