Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Segarra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 20, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a telephone operator at a luxury hotel. Following an incident in which he failed to properly record a guest’s request for a wake-up call, claimant was presented with a final warning and last chance agreement. When his supervisor met with him to discuss it, he became angry, threw the documents on the desk and made inappropriate comments. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MontanyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of PiervencentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re NaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SetzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re Claim of MusacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. In re the Claim of ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re the Claim of TeixeiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API