Legal Opinion

In re Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1405Claimant worked at a department store as the manager of the cosmetics counter. She got into a disagreement with her supervisor when she was told that she would have to work three consecutive evenings. During the discussion, which took place in a public area, claimant used profanity and refused to work the scheduled hours. Claimant’s employment was terminated as a result. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that her employment was terminated due to misconduct and the Board adhered to this decision upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SegarraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of PiervencentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HallockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. In re the Claim of HallockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API