Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1909No. Crim. No. 156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to the custodian, of the city jail of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application for writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner was arrested upon a charge of vagrancy, and' on the eighteenth day of March, 1909, entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced by the court to serve one hundred and eighty days in the city jail of Los Angeles. Sentence was suspended “to leave city.” Thereafter, on October 19, 1909, the defendant was brought before the court charged with violating the terms of the suspended sentence. Thereupon the court ordered a commitment to issue and directed the imprisonment of petitioner under the original judgment. This writ is prosecuted by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. In Re GianniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. In Re TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API