Legal Opinion
Nix v. James
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1925No. 4601PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCAMANT,
Circuit Judge (after stating tho facts as above).
No procedural questions have been presented in this ca ,e for our consideration, and we will us' .itut' that the record properly raises tk- iJi'.riku argued and submitted. This question is whether the Probation Act of March 1925, is applicable to a defendant wL<> ini, sentenced to imprisonment at a iei/i o i court which expired before the act in que Aon was passed, and when the defenc fu-s not yet been imprisoned. Sections X. L*. and 5 of the Probation Act are as follow??:
“Be it enacted by the Delirio -aid House of Representatives of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. HerreraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Hamilton J. Whiting v. Henry F. MaioliniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Kriebel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- United States v. SpilotroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Hoffa v. SaxbeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.