Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 17, 1921PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Radford.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

John W. Richardson, who was prosecuted under the name of John Richardson, assigns error in the final judgment of the trial court committing him to jail for thirty days for a violation of the prohibition statute.

These facts appear: On November 10, 1919, the accused having pleaded guilty, the following order was entered:

“This day the Commonwealth by its attorney and the accused by his attorney, by and with the consent of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the' accused pleaded guilty to the indictment against him; whereupon the court imposed a fine of $50.00 and fixed the period of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  4. People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Belden v. HugoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Grant v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Marshall v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
  4. Dyke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1940

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API