Legal Opinion

Hunter v. First State Bank of Morrilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, O. J.,

(after stating the facts). As suggested by the circuit court in directing a verdict for the defendant, the first impulse of nearly every. one would be in the circumstances of the case to find for the plaintiff; but, under the well-established principles of law heretofore decided by this court, this cannot be done.

The suit is predicated upon the theoiy that the facts called for the application of the doctrine of respondeat superior, which rests upon the proposition that, in doing the acts out of which the accident arose, the servant was representing the master at the time and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crowell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Sweeden v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Martinelli v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Ford & Son Sanitary Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Salmons v. Dun & BradstreetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Van Dalsen v. InmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Casteel v. Yantis-Harper Tire CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API