Legal Opinion

Martinelli v. Bond

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1919No. Civ. No. 2799PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.

Plaintiff suffered personal injuries caused by a collision between a motorcycle which he was riding and an automobile driven by the defendant Noonan and owned by his employer, the defendant Bond. In this action, brought to recover damages for such injuries, a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff against both defendants. From the judgment following such verdict the defendants prosecute separate appeals. This appeal is by the defendant Bond.

The appellant contends, first, that any judgment against him was erroneous, for the reason that the" automobile was being used at the time of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Cunningham v. CastleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Gousse v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Crouch v. Gilmore Oil Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fahey v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Hunter v. First State Bank of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API