Legal Opinion
Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 16, 1931PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
Appellant instituted this action against appellee to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellee's salesman in operating its automobile.
According to the evidence for appellant, about eleven o'clock on the night of September 14, 1929, while M. B. Sheridan was going to El Dorado in his automobile, the gas in his car became stopped up, and he flagged down the car in which James Mullins was riding to get a pair of pliers. Sheridan was going west and was parked on the right side of the road. Mullins stopped his car and reached…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Terry Dairy Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bobby Breeding and Hugh Breeding, Inc. v. Ben Massey and Mrs. Ben MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Golenternek v. KurthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Arkansas Baking Company v. WymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Ball v. HailSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Ford & Son Sanitary Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.