Legal Opinion

Groom v. Health Net

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 2000No. B131271PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.—

Introduction

Plaintiff and respondent Sarah Groom (Groom) sued defendants and appellants Health Net and Health Systems International, Inc. (collectively Health Net) and others not party to this appeal. Groom, a subscriber to a health plan administered by Health Net, a duly organized health maintenance organization (HMO), alleges that as a result of Health Net’s refusal or failure to timely provide a neurological examination, a prescription drug, and an MR angiogram and cardiac workup, Groom suffered a disabling stroke.

After demurring to Groom’s original, first…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Roman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API