United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeates
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
With respect to the bill
of complaint, appellant’s insistence is that the showing of a judgment for complainant against Wm. It. Remond, even with the showing that the real person, who was sued and served with process, and who actually appeared and defended the suit, without objection because of the misnomer, was If. W. Remond, is not sufficient to fasten liability upon the appellant company as insurer of N. W. Remond, under the provisions of sections 8376 and 8377 of the Code. These statutes impose an absolute liability upon the insurer when the loss or damage for which the insured is liable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. YeatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Tarleton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Ware's Adm'r v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RemondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Federal Automobile Ins. Ass'n v. AbramsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Sansom v. New Amsterdam Ins.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1951
- Pyle v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.