Legal Opinion

Federal Automobile Ins. Ass'n v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1928No. 6 Div. 36PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal was from the ruling on demurrer. This is a proceeding in equity under the provisions of sections 8376 and S377 of the Code of 1923. The complainant was injured in an automobile accident, and obtained a judgment against the respondent therefor. The bill, as last amended, alleges that the respondent, Federal Automobile Insurance Association, a reciprocal insurance association, issued a policy of insurance to the said respondent, Fannie E. Jordan, on April 14, 1925, under the terms of which it agreed to indemnify her against loss resulting directly from the operation of the automobile…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WerfelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Knox v. Western World Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hare, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Indemnity Co. of America v. BollasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API