Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 1996No. 18041-3-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haberly, J. *

Dale Palmer appeals the decision of the trial court that he was not exempt from successor tax liability to the Department of Revenue, upon his repossession of collateral pursuant to a security agreement. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In July 1986, Robert Kolstad d/b/a/ Top Water Sports (Kolstad) obtained secured financing for his business from Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation (Borg-Warner). On July 25, 1986, Borg-Warner perfected its security interest in Kolstad’s business property, including boats and trailers, by filing a Uniform Commercial Code financing statement with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Impecoven v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Clam Shacks of America, Inc. v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Shum v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Safeway, Inc. v. Deparment of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Safeway, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Simpson Investment Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Peacock v. Public Disclosure CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API