Legal Opinion

Martin v. Meier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1988No. 54796-3PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brachtenbach, J. —

The issue is whether a plaintiff in a case arising from a motor vehicle accident may properly serve a summons and complaint according to the procedure in RCW 46.64.040, the nonresident motorist statute, where the plaintiff has with due diligence attempted to find and serve defendant and where plaintiff has a good faith basis to believe the defendant has departed the state. We answer yes, and conclude that the plaintiff in this case has made such a showing. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

On September 1, 1982, plaintiff Debra C. Martin and defendant Marvin L.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Golden Gate Hop Ranch, Inc. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Huff v. BudbillWashington Supreme Court · 2000

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API