Legal Opinion

Clam Shacks of America, Inc. v. Skagit County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1987No. 53228-1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brachtenbach, J. —

Does the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), RCW 90.58, authorize local governments to require conditional use permits for shoreline activities which are not "developments" as defined by the SMA? The trial court and the Court of Appeals held there was such authority. We affirm.

This dispute arises from Clam Shacks' efforts to harvest clams commercially from leased, privately owned, mud-flat tidelands in Skagit Bay. The tidelands are within an area designated as "[s]horelines of state-wide significance". See RCW 90.58.030(2) (e) (ii) (D). Skagit County had adopted, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Narrowsview Preservation Ass'n v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. English Bay Enterprises, Ltd. v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ritchie v. MarkleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Toandos Peninsula Ass'n v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API