Peacock v. Public Disclosure Commission
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
Richard Peacock appeals from a superior court decision affirming the Public Disclosure Commission’s (PDC) declaratory order that his Cedar County Committee is a "grass roots lobbying campaign” that must comply with the PDC’s registration and reporting requirements. We hold that the Committee’s effort to distribute informational brochures and to gather signatures to create a new county from a part of King County is intended primarily to influence legislation and, as such, is a "grass roots lobbying campaign” subject to the PDC’s disclosure requirements. We affirm.
Richard Peacock is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Overton v. Economic Assistance AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Cedar County Committee v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Cedar County Committee v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Many Cultures, One Message v. ClementsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.