Legal Opinion

State v. Sweat

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1997No. 95-1975-CRPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

¶1. The . issue presented in this case is whether in restitution pro*412ceedings, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(l4)(b)1 allows a defendant to assert a civil rather than criminal statute of limitations, and its related civil tolling and discovery rules, to bar individual crime victims' claims for restitution. The Wood County Circuit Court, the Honorable John V. Finn, presiding, answered "no" and denied the defendant's claim that the civil statute of limitations and its related tolling principles applied to limit restitution. The court ordered the defendant, Robert W. Sweat, to pay a total of $364,597.23 in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Rogelio Salcedo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Betthauser v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. County of Jefferson v. RenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Huml v. VlaznyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API