UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.
The issue in this case is whether Wis. Stat. § 102.42(2)(a) (1993-94), 1 a section of the Worker's Compensation Act (the Act), requires UFE Incorporated (UFE) to pay the out-of-state health care expenses incurred by one of its employees without UFE's consent. The court of appeals interpreted Wis. Stat. § 102.42(2)(a) as not requiring UFE's consent to the out-of-state health care expenses since the expenses were incurred through a referral from a practitioner who was chosen in accordance with the statute. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 193 Wis. 2d 361, 369-70, 534 N.W.2d 627 (Ct. App. 1995). We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Nigbor v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.