Legal Opinion

UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1996No. 94-2794PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether Wis. Stat. § 102.42(2)(a) (1993-94), 1 a section of the Worker's Compensation Act (the Act), requires UFE Incorporated (UFE) to pay the out-of-state health care expenses incurred by one of its employees without UFE's consent. The court of appeals interpreted Wis. Stat. § 102.42(2)(a) as not requiring UFE's consent to the out-of-state health care expenses since the expenses were incurred through a referral from a practitioner who was chosen in accordance with the statute. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 193 Wis. 2d 361, 369-70, 534 N.W.2d 627 (Ct. App. 1995). We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nigbor v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API