Legal Opinion
Huml v. Vlazny
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 2006No. 2004AP36PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*175DAVID T. PROSSER, J.
¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification by the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) § 809.61 (2003-04).1 It addresses the relationship between the restitution order in a criminal case and a subsequent settlement agreement in a civil case. The Walworth County Circuit Court, John R. Race, Judge, dismissed Robert Vlazny's (Vlazny) motion to enforce a settlement agreement to preclude Theresa Huml (Huml) from enforcing a judgment derived from a criminal restitution order, after Vlazny was released from probation.
¶ 2. We are presented with two issues.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Wisconsin Label Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Town Bank v. City Real Estate Development, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Randy L. Betz v. Diamond Jim's Auto SalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Emirat AG v. High Point Printing LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.