Legal Opinion
United States v. Rogelio Salcedo-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1990No. 89-50225PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
Rogelio Salcedo-Lopez and a confidential informant for the United States Department of State engaged in three transac tions for the purchase of false birth certificates and Social Security cards. The informant paid Salcedo $100 for the first set of documents, and $120 for each of two additional sets. The first two sets of documents were delivered to the informant. The government found the third set in Sal-cedo’s possession during a search pursuant to a warrant.
Salcedo was charged with two counts of transferring false identification documents and one count of possessing false identification…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. William DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Steven Wayne TylerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Clarence RuffenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Joseph DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Daryl E. Ratliff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GibbensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ricky L. HampshireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Sean Meacham (93-1692) and Ramone Botello (93-1768)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.