Caulfield v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COUBT.
by the plaintiff in an action for personal injuries from a judgment entered in her favor in the sum of $400.
The trial court denied her motion for a new trial, one of the grounds of which was the inadequacy of the award.
She alleged that she fell from a moving street car which was negligently operated by defendant company, and suffered certain physical injuries.
There was a conflict in the testimony as to the nature and extent of her injuries; and from that adduced by the defendant the jury was justified in finding that they were not serious or permanent.
It was testified that she lost…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Zimmer v. KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Dreyer v. CyriacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Davis v. FyfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Muench v. GerskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Malinson v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Burch v. Levy Bros. Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Gridley v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.