Zimmer v. Kilborn
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Stanley A. Smith, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff obtained judgment for five hundred dollars, but being dissatisfied appeals therefrom and from an -order denying his motion for a new trial.
The suit was on an assigned claim for services alleged to have been performed by J. L. Murphey and the law firms of Murphey & Schmidt and Murphey & Poplin for and on behalf of the defendant. We have discussed the pleadings in the opinion this day filed, ante, p. 521, [132 Pac. 1025], sustaining the order by which plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the verdict for the full sum sued for in the complaint was denied.
The first point made by appellant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- San Luis Water Co. v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Rawlins v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Zimmer v. KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by22 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.