Legal Opinion

Davis v. Fyfe

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1930No. Docket No. 6886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was brought to recover a balance of sums advanced by plaintiffs, who were the brothers of defendant’s wife, to provide her with the necessaries of life. The defendant admitted his failure to provide, and the court found that the amounts claimed were advanced and actually used for that purpose. Defendant has appealed from the judgment which was entered against him.

He contends that the necessaries not having been directly furnished or paid for by plaintiffs, although procured with the sums advanced, there can be no recovery. Section 174 of the Civil Code provides: “If the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Laumeier v. . LaumeierNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Angell v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Odone v. MarzocchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Watterson v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Catanzaro v. DuzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API