Legal Opinion

Caprita v. Caprita

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1945No. 30032PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

When faced with the defendant’s request to dismiss her cross-petition on December 31, 1943, did the trial court have the power to approve an entry journalizing its decree as of December 13, 1943, the date the complete and final decree was announced?

Courts of record have inherent power to make their records speak the truth. The function of an entry nunc pro tunc is the correction of judicial records insofar as they fail to record, or improperly record, a judgment rendered by the court, as distinguished from the correction of an error in the judgment itself, or in the failure to render the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Tikalsky v. TikalskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Schneider v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Hoyt v. HoytNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BreedloveOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Central Trust Co. v. First National Bank of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API