Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Hoyt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 24, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOTE. — The chancellor has directed that the opinion in this case, filed as a memorandum in 1917, be now printed as an opinion in connection with, and immediately following, that in Vogler v. Vogler, supra. — Rep. On August 8th, 1893, the petitioner filed a petition for divorce from her then husband, and such proceedings were had that the late Isaac S. Taylor, Esq., to whom the cause was referred as special master, took testimony, and in a report dated January 17th, 1894, certified that he was of opinion that all the material facts charged in the petition were true, and that a decree of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Administration of the Estate of CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Central Savings Bank v. ShineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. Dunham v. DunhamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  4. Mead v. MeadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Webber v. . WebberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caprita v. CapritaOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Parker v. ParkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Fulton v. FultonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Thrash v. ThrashMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Herman v. HermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API