Tikalsky v. Tikalsky
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The plaintiff and defendant were married in January, 1919. Both had been previously married and were well along in years. In December, 1919, plaintiff brought this suit asking for a limited divorce from defendant and for an allowance for maintenance out of his property. Defendant interposed a cross-complaint asking for an absolute divorce from plaintiff. In July, 1920, the court made findings of fact'to the effect that the charges made by plaintiff against defendant were not true and that the charges made by defendant against plaintiff were true, and that plaintiff had received…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re the Administration of the Estate of CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Danforth v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- In Re Estate of SeilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cornell v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Caprita v. CapritaOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Berkenfield v. JacobsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Hobson v. Dempsey Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.