Legal Opinion · Dissent

Birch v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2007No. 05-36216Published

1DissentPaez, Circuit Judge

Martin Birch was convicted in 1981 and 1989. Prior to a 1993 amendment, Oregon’s parole review statute required an expert diagnosis as a prerequisite to a decision by the Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision (“Board”) to postpone a prisoner’s parole date. See Or.Rev.Stat. § 144.125(3) (1981) (1989); see also Newcomb v. Thompson, 176 Or. App. 167, 33 P.3d 319, 320 (2001) (holding that the Board could not make a finding of present severe emotional disturbance absent a “cognizable psychiatric or psychological diagnosis”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); Weidner v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Christenson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API