State v. Munro
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
In accordance with a lawful warrant authorizing the search for and seizure of drug-related evidence, the police seized a Beta videotape from defendant’s apartment. When the police initially played the videotape, it appeared to be blank. A year later, the police received information that the videotape contained evidence of child pornography. The police examined the tape again, this time looking for images of children engaged in unlawful sexual activity. Again the tape appeared to be blank. Eventually, using a different tape player, the police were able to view pornographic images of children…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. MansorOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Peiffer v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.