Legal Opinion
State v. Trenary
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 12, 1992No. 89CR2991; CA A65385PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*610De MUNIZ, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. He makes two assignments of error. He claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the results of field sobriety tests that he voluntarily took without first being advised of the consequences of refusal. He also claims that the results of his breath test should have been suppressed, because his right to consult a lawyer before taking the test was violated. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
On December 20, 1989, Oregon State Police Officer Foust…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MacHucaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- City of Roseburg v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.