In re Minix
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Concurrence
J. Brett Busby, Justice, Concurring
CONCURRING OPINION
Under the statute enacted by the Legislature, this is a straightforward case. Section 153.0071(d) of the Family Code provides that in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, a mediated settlement agreement (MSA) meeting certain formal requirements is binding on the parties.1 With specifically enumerated exceptions not applicable here, a party "is entitled to judgment on" such an agreement "notwithstanding Rule 11, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, or another rule of law." Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.0071(e) (West 2014).
The majority…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.