Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Minix

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 2018No. 14–17–00417–CVPublished

1Concurrence

J. Brett Busby, Justice, Concurring

CONCURRING OPINION

Under the statute enacted by the Legislature, this is a straightforward case. Section 153.0071(d) of the Family Code provides that in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, a mediated settlement agreement (MSA) meeting certain formal requirements is binding on the parties.1 With specifically enumerated exceptions not applicable here, a party "is entitled to judgment on" such an agreement "notwithstanding Rule 11, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, or another rule of law." Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.0071(e) (West 2014).

The majority…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API