Legal Opinion

Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2017No. 14-0819PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

in which Justice Green, Justice Guzman, Justice Lehrmann, Justice Devine, and Justice Brown joined. Phil Johnson, Justice

This case requires us to interpret Texas’s “tied house” statutes that prohibit overlapping ownership between the manufacturing, wholesaling, and retailing segments of the alcoholic beverage industry.

Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA) owns 20% of the stock in two Heineken companies which in turn own breweries. The brewers hold non-resident manufacturer’s permits in Texas. FEMSA also owns, through intermediate holding companies, 100% of Cadena Com-ercial USA…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Youngkin v. HinesTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Timothy Castleman & Castleman Consulting, LLC v. Internet Money Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Joy Worsdale, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Worsdale v. the City of Killeen, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Robert B. James, DDS, Inc. Robert B. James, DDS, Individually Jean James, Individually And Alexis Mei Pyles, Individually v. Cassandra J. Elkins, DDS, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API