Legal Opinion

International Lubricant Corp. v. Grant

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 28, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Defendant in error, as plaintiff in the court .below, recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error, International Lubricant Corporation, in the sum of $15,-000.00 for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant’s agent in the operation of an automobile belonging to plaintiff in error, as a result of which said automobile was run into' and against an automobile being driven by the plaintiff.

No contention is made on behalf of plaintiff in error that the evidence in the case was ‘ not sufficient to sustain ,the allegations of negligence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holstun & Son v. EmbrySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Florida Motor Transportation Co. v. HillmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. McMurray v. BasnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  5. Langford v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Skinner v. OchiltreeSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Chambers v. NottebaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Turner v. Modern Beauty Supply Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Saucer v. City of West Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. McHugh v. Miami Transit CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API