Saucer v. City of West Palm Beach
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BUFORD, J.:
The appellant, plaintiff below, joined by her husband, filed suit against the City of West Palm Beach, Florida, claiming the City allowed a sidewalk to be in a bad and unsafe condition, and that she stepped into a depression and fell, suffering injuries, as set forth in declaration.
To the second amended declaration the defendant City filed two pleas, one a plea of “not guilty” and the other a plea of contributory negligence. The case was tried before a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied and,plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Harris v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- LeSuer v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. StuartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Acosta v. DaughtryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.