Legal Opinion

Saucer v. City of West Palm Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 6, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

The appellant, plaintiff below, joined by her husband, filed suit against the City of West Palm Beach, Florida, claiming the City allowed a sidewalk to be in a bad and unsafe condition, and that she stepped into a depression and fell, suffering injuries, as set forth in declaration.

To the second amended declaration the defendant City filed two pleas, one a plea of “not guilty” and the other a plea of contributory negligence. The case was tried before a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied and,plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Harris v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  3. LeSuer v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. StuartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Acosta v. DaughtryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API