Legal Opinion

Langford v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 20, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

Defendant in error listed for sale with the plaintiff in error two tracts of land in DeSoto and Hardee Counties at a price of $50.00 per acre. The terms of sale were one-fourth cash and the balance in one, two, and three years, a commission of five per cent, to be allowed for making the sale. Plaintiff in error produced a buyer, the sale was consummated on the terms stated, and the cash payment was made.

Before the sale was made plaintiff in error engaged one, J. W. McCoy, to help him secure a buyer and promised to split commission with him. Through means not necessary to recite other parties…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Coker v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  3. Sims v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Murphy v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Walker and McClelland v. ChanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Dempsey-Vanderbilt Hotel, Inc. v. HuismanSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API