McHugh v. Miami Transit Company
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, J.:
The question here is whether the court below erred by ordering a remittitur of $20,000.00 from a $40,000.00 verdict in lieu of plaintiff to a new trial.
Plaintiff-appellant was injured by the negligent operation of a bus operated by the Miami Transit Company. At the time of the injury plaintiff was 28 years old, was in good' health, was married and had two children. His life expectancy was' 36.73 years. His only trade was news printing as a press operator which yielded a salary of $3,900.00 annually.
Due to his injury he will never be able to resume his trade because he cannot remain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breeding's Dania Drug Co. v. RunyonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Albert v. Miami Transit CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Florida Motor Lines Corporation v. BarrySupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- S. A. Freel Distributing Co., Inc. v. LenoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- International Lubricant Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tinsley v. TinsleySupreme Court of Florida · 1960