Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Montgomery Ward Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 21, 1986No. A8001-00003, A8001-00004, A8001-00005; CA A30941PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendants are owners of real property on which Mall 205, a shopping center in east Multnomah County, is located. The state commenced this eminent domain proceeding to acquire a portion of defendants’ land to construct an access road to Interstate 205 (1-205). The plans for the access road called for relocating S.E. 96th Avenue in a diagonal across defendants’ land, dividing the property in two. The new road severs a triangle of approximately 4.2 acres from the rest of the shopping center.
The state filed three complaints against various defendants involving different portions of the property.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Department of Transportation v. New Century Engineering & Development Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- State Highway Commission v. StumboOregon Supreme Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ocean Road Partners v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. El Dorado PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. FullertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. SchoppertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Ester v. City of MonmouthOregon Tax Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.