Legal Opinion
State Highway Commission v. Stumbo
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1960PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant landowners from a judgment of condemnation obtained against their property in the circuit court for Douglas County by the State Highway Commission, acting in the exercise of its powers of eminent domain. Constitution of Oregon, Art I, § 18; ORS 366.340 et seq.; ORS. 374.035 et seq. Various parties and political subdivisions were joined as defendants, but all of these, defaulted except numerous heirs of S. R. and C. W. Stumbo, represented by their attorney-in-fact, Robert Gordon Stumbo. These defendants will hereafter be referred to as the “Stumbos.” The…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Creek NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Morrison v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Garver v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.