Legal Opinion

Kratz v. Bonner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1934No. 6 Div. 555PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

“We have frequently referred to the settled rule in Alabama, that an existing creditor may have the chancery court set aside a deed as fraudulent, when it is voluntary, without an allegation that the debtor was insolvent, or that the parties participated in an intent to defraud. It has been many times held that allegations such as are here stated are sufficient as against that claim. The authorities are cited in Birmingham Property Co. v. Jackson Securities & Investment Co., 226 Ala. 612, 148 So. 316; Kuykendall v. Terry, 227 Ala. 227, 149 So. 687.” Waites et al. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Birmingham Property Co. v. Jackson Securities & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Waites v. First Nat. Bank of WetumpkaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Kuykendall v. TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WerfelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Drain v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Cody v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Wade v. Brantley & Crawley Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Denton v. LindlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API