Drain v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The bill in this suit was filed by a judgment creditor, whose debt was in existence at the time the mortgage sought to be vacated was made.
In paragraph 4, it is alleged that the mortgage was a voluntary conveyance in its entirety, or, in the alternative, that the recited consideration was, in large part, pretended, simulated, and untrue, and intended to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors. The rules which apply to such a situation are that, if the conveyance is voluntary, it is void as to existing creditors. No other allegations are necessary. So that the first alternative…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Howell v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Reynolds v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- McDowell v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Frank S. Blackford, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Munro-Van Helms Company v. Commercial Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- McGowin v. McGowinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Mitchell v. ConwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Horton v. SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.