Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Terry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1933No. 8 Div. 496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainants seek the enforcement of their judgment lien against defendant Kuykendall, and in aid thereof the setting aside of conveyances by said Kuykendall to his several codefendants of separate tracts of real estate.

The bill discloses that at the time of the execution of these several conveyances complainants were existing creditors of Kuykendall, and charges that these several transactions were voluntary and without consideration. Complainants established by their proof the existence of their debt at the time, and antedating these conveyances, and it is the well-settled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yeend v. WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Murphy v. PipkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Ledbetter v. Davenport Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Bailey v. Levy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Drain v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Kratz v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Wade v. Brantley & Crawley Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Lacey v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API