Legal Opinion

Cody v. Stanford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1934No. 1 Div. 812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Bill of complaint by creditor to set aside a conveyance by her debtor, charging that said conveyance was voluntary, or, in the alternative, that it was with the intent to hinder and defraud the complainant.

It is well settled by the decisions of this court that an existing creditor may have the chancery court set aside a deed as fraudulent when it is voluntary, without allegation, that debtor was insolvent or that parties participated in intent to defraud. Kratz et al. v. Bonner, 228 Ala. 607, 155 So. 77; Birmingham Property Co. et al. v. Jackson Securities & Investment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yeend v. WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Little v. Sterne & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Troy v. Smith & ShieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Birmingham Property Co. v. Jackson Securities & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Tyson v. South. C. O. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Headley v. HeadleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Denton v. LindlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Autrey v. LattaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API