Legal Opinion

Tinter v. Lucik

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2007No. 88587PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Sweeney, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Elizabeth M. Tinter, appeals from the trial court’s order granting a directed verdict in favor of defendants-appellees, Marilyn Lucik and Mrs. Jean’s Greens Inc., on her claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and conversion. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

{¶ 2} A review of the record reveals the following facts: Lucik is a florist and owns a floral shop in Berea, Ohio called Mrs. Jean’s Greens (“the Berea store”). Tinter and Lucik first met sometime in 1995, when Tinter purchased some…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ohio Telephone Equipment & Sales, Inc. v. Hadler Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Johnson, 22178 (5-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Simek v. Orthopedic & Neurological Consultants, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Wuliger v. Cannella Response Television, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. Hickerson v. HickersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Davis v. CantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API