Legal Opinion
Wuliger v. Cannella Response Television, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 6, 2011No. Case No. 1:05 CV 854PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motions for Summary Judgement of Defendant Cannella Response Television, Inc. (“Cannella” or “Cannella Television”) (Doc. No. 159) and Defendant Frank Cannella (collectively “Defendants”) (Doc. No. 163) and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of the Receiver (Doc. No. 166), as well as the responses and replies to each. The Court notes diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and proper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. For the reasons stated below, Frank Cannella’s Motion will be granted in its entirety and the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Slone v. Anderson (In re Anderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Granger Plastics Company v. Bluewater ATU LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Jefferson v. Intelligrated IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021