Wheeler v. Johnson, 22178 (5-30-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Wanda Wheeler appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of defendants-appellees Scarlett Lee Johnson, a.k.a. Scarlett Lee Walker ("Johnson"), Air Dan, Inc. ("Air Dan"), and Jade, Inc. ("Jade"). Wheeler contends that the trial court erred because there is a genuine issue of material fact whether Wheeler acquired a minority share interest in Air Dan and Jade due to her ownership of shares in a predecessor corporation.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment in favor of Johnson, Air Dan, and Jade. The undisputed facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Greer-Burger v. TemesiOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Telecom Acquisition Corp. I, Inc. v. Lucic Ents., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Mishler v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Edelman v. JELBSOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.