Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Johnson, 22178 (5-30-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2008No. 22178PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Wanda Wheeler appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of defendants-appellees Scarlett Lee Johnson, a.k.a. Scarlett Lee Walker ("Johnson"), Air Dan, Inc. ("Air Dan"), and Jade, Inc. ("Jade"). Wheeler contends that the trial court erred because there is a genuine issue of material fact whether Wheeler acquired a minority share interest in Air Dan and Jade due to her ownership of shares in a predecessor corporation.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment in favor of Johnson, Air Dan, and Jade. The undisputed facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Greer-Burger v. TemesiOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Telecom Acquisition Corp. I, Inc. v. Lucic Ents., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Mishler v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Edelman v. JELBSOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API